I run Advanced Tomato 136 which is based on Shibby on a Netgear R7000.
For some reason my router will not port forward to anything running on the router itself, such as Transmission, the built in NGINX web server, etc. But port 9091 seems to be open, which is Transmission's port for the gui. I can access it locally but not remotely. I have DDNS set up so I use the name not my WAN IP, which changes from time to time.
I just tried 132 without nvram clear and it didn't work.
I will try it with nvram clear but there is a lot more to it. I need to kick everyone off the network and recreate all my settings. I have a fair amount of that - different MAC, different IP than the default, guest network, DHCP reservations, firewall script, port forwarding, etc.
In my experience when you do nvram clear followed by applying a settings file, usually whatever issue you have returns. So you have to do clear and rebuild everything from scratch. Wish me luck.
w/o nvram clear will not work for sure. Question is when you upgraded from v132 to v136 did you clear nvram? - it is obligatory and will definitely not work if you will not do that. Because from v133 MultiWAN was added there was a lot of changes, different parameters etc and without nvram clear will not work. You cannot even load your confirg from v132 to new v136 after nvram clear and you cannot back to old version the same way.
Orange 300/50 Mb/s + ONT Terminal HPE MS gen8 Proxmox 7.0-11 VMs: Router OPNsense 23.X-amd64 and OMV HPE MicroServer gen8: Xeon E3-1265Lv2, 16GB (2x KTH-PL316E/8G), HP 331T, 4x4TB WD RED Asus RT-AC68U AccessPoint
port forward to anything running on the router itself
port forward you should use if you want forward connections to any of device INSIDE your local network. If server is launched directly on router, then you have to OPEN port(s), not forward them.
Build-in services will open required ports automatically. Make sure that:
1) you erase nvram after install newer version of tomato
2) you have DISABLED DMZ service
3) you don`t configure those port on port forwarding page
That`s it.
Router:Unifi Cloud Gateway Max Switch:Unifi USW-Lite-16-PoE Switch:Unifi USW-Flex-Mini - szt. 2 Wi-Fi:Unifi U6-Lite - szt. 2 Proxmox VE:i5-13400T, 64GB RAM, 2x 512GB NVMe, 3x 2TB SSD VM #1:Synology SA6400 VM #2:Debian, WWW VM #3: Home Assistant OS
Thanks to Shibby and the others that have chimed in.
I did notice in my iptables that 9091 was opened when I use the gui (advanced tomato) to turn on Transmission. On another forum it was suggested I add a rule to open 9091. I did try that but in the end I was really applying the same rule the built in service did automatically. So there are now two duplicate rules for the same port.
I will put it back to 136 with erase nvram when I have a chance. I'm bummed I have to rebuild all the settings from scratch but it is what it is.
Thanks to Shibby and the others that have chimed in.
I did notice in my iptables that 9091 was opened when I use the gui (advanced tomato) to turn on Transmission. On another forum it was suggested I add a rule to open 9091. I did try that but in the end I was really applying the same rule the built in service did automatically. So there are now two duplicate rules for the same port.
I will put it back to 136 with erase nvram when I have a chance. I'm bummed I have to rebuild all the settings from scratch but it is what it is.
I'll post results afterwards.
136 with clear nvram did not work. I will try 132 next. I also read on another forum there actually is a way to save most of your settings and use them after re-flashing and clearing nvram. The only thing is I failed to use a quotation mark in the right place, so I rebuilt most of the settings manually before discovering this... nvram set "...." rather than nvram set ....
Thanks to Shibby and the others that have chimed in.
I did notice in my iptables that 9091 was opened when I use the gui (advanced tomato) to turn on Transmission. On another forum it was suggested I add a rule to open 9091. I did try that but in the end I was really applying the same rule the built in service did automatically. So there are now two duplicate rules for the same port.
I will put it back to 136 with erase nvram when I have a chance. I'm bummed I have to rebuild all the settings from scratch but it is what it is.
Thanks to Shibby and the others that have chimed in.
I did notice in my iptables that 9091 was opened when I use the gui (advanced tomato) to turn on Transmission. On another forum it was suggested I add a rule to open 9091. I did try that but in the end I was really applying the same rule the built in service did automatically. So there are now two duplicate rules for the same port.
I will put it back to 136 with erase nvram when I have a chance. I'm bummed I have to rebuild all the settings from scratch but it is what it is.
Thanks to Shibby and the others that have chimed in.
I did notice in my iptables that 9091 was opened when I use the gui (advanced tomato) to turn on Transmission. On another forum it was suggested I add a rule to open 9091. I did try that but in the end I was really applying the same rule the built in service did automatically. So there are now two duplicate rules for the same port.
I will put it back to 136 with erase nvram when I have a chance. I'm bummed I have to rebuild all the settings from scratch but it is what it is.
I'll post results afterwards.
136 with clear nvram did not work. I will try 132 next. I also read on another forum there actually is a way to save most of your settings and use them after re-flashing and clearing nvram. The only thing is I failed to use a quotation mark in the right place, so I rebuilt most of the settings manually before discovering this... nvram set "...." rather than nvram set ....
Thanks to Shibby and the others that have chimed in.
I did notice in my iptables that 9091 was opened when I use the gui (advanced tomato) to turn on Transmission. On another forum it was suggested I add a rule to open 9091. I did try that but in the end I was really applying the same rule the built in service did automatically. So there are now two duplicate rules for the same port.
I will put it back to 136 with erase nvram when I have a chance. I'm bummed I have to rebuild all the settings from scratch but it is what it is.
I'll post results afterwards.
Połączony z 14 czerwiec 2016 18:06:28:
Thanks to Shibby and the others that have chimed in.
I did notice in my iptables that 9091 was opened when I use the gui (advanced tomato) to turn on Transmission. On another forum it was suggested I add a rule to open 9091. I did try that but in the end I was really applying the same rule the built in service did automatically. So there are now two duplicate rules for the same port.
I will put it back to 136 with erase nvram when I have a chance. I'm bummed I have to rebuild all the settings from scratch but it is what it is.
I'll post results afterwards.
Edytowany przez shredhead1080 dnia 14-06-2016 18:06
· Łącznie użytkowników: 24,126 · Najnowszy użytkownik: goldi111
Czat
Musisz się zalogować, aby opublikować wiadomość.
servee
24-01-2025 18:18
Światłowód + mediakonwenter. Ekranowana skrętka nie jest wymagana, taką sytuację już zastałem. Zamierzam ją wymienić na zwykłą. Da to coś?
shibby
17-01-2025 07:45
a ta skrętka ekranowana o której piszesz to jakiś wkopany przewód do bramy/furtki/kamer y zewn? Jak tak to jego też przez zabezpieczenie podepnij.
shibby
17-01-2025 07:43
no to pora zabezpieczyć kable LAN zabezpieczeniami przeciwprzepięciow ymi - tanio nie będzie. Jak przychodzi ci internet? Skrętką czy światłem? Jak skrętką to zacząłbym od tego.
servee
12-01-2025 12:52
Ponownie padły mi wszystkie porty sieciowe w routerze - to już 3-ci w 6 m-cy. Podejrzany to ekranowana, nieuziemiona skrętka - 12mb. Czy jest to możliwe?
dawidt
21-12-2024 01:09
siema
Maniek91PL
06-11-2024 22:37
dzięki !
maxikaaz
29-10-2024 14:27
@Maniek91PL - Administration=> Admin Access, i tam masz "Allow Wireless Access" do zaznaczenia
Maniek91PL
26-10-2024 22:07
siemka! ktoś przypomni co się ustawiało jeśli nie mogę wejść od strony wifi do tomato? od lan działa
overflow2
04-10-2024 17:34
Kupowałem Asusy n10u albo n12d1 ale nie widzę ich, chyba już nie produkują, Chodzi o coś nowego i taniego. Transfery niewielkie.
maxikaaz
04-10-2024 09:38
@overflow2 patrząc po dostępności funkcji w nowych kompilacjach, to chyba nawet WRT54G/GL jeszcze ma OpenVPN, albo jakiś odpowiednik... zależy, na jakie transfery liczysz.
' target='_blank'>Link
